Slydog skis have a unique keel shape that provides more traction without the side-effect of darting. To understand the keel’s design, picture a pyramid that runs the length of the ski with its point stuck to the bottom of the ski. This creates two channels to scoop and compress snow, and then melt and refreeze the snow to create a rail for the keel to turn against, the company claims. We didn’t have the means to prove whether the snow melted and refroze, and frankly, we didn’t care. What mattered was if the skis helped our 2005 Ski-Doo MX Z X 600 H.O. demo sled we tested them on gain traction up front.

Weight, or lack thereof, is the first thing we noticed about the Slydog skis. The company claims each 6-inch wide ski weighs 5.4 pounds if equipped with a 4-inch carbide. Mass is reduced due to the saddleless design and thin profile. We installed the skis with a set of 4-inch carbides; the sled’s 1.25-inch lug track had 96 studs in the center belt. The company claims the skis typically require less carbide than most skis because they work as aggressively as the rider. The harder a driver pushes the ski, the harder it carves its line.

Our first test run proved that the skis help the front end bite better than with the stock Precision skis, but the sled still pushed. We shortened the sled’s front limiter strap 1 inch; that put the front and rear traction in near-perfect balance.

We put more than 1,000 miles on the skis, and they greatly improved our sled’s handling characteristics. Drivers felt much more confident that the sled would hold its line through corners. The added control caused a minimal increase in steering effort and darting.

Due to the keel’s scoop design, a few peanut sized rocks got wedged in the keel. We once found a metal chunk of foreign material there, too. The ski has been updated for 2006 to reduce that from happening. At season’s end, the plastic hadn’t faded and looked as good as new on the top side, but the underside was worn.

Slydog skis are made from the same UHMW polyethylene as most other aftermarket and OEM skis, but the soles of our Slydogs look like they suffered more wear than other skis in our fleet. Wear is obviously affected by trail conditions, and perhaps our MX Z ran on trails with less snow than other sleds, but one ski cracked across the keel through the carbide’s front mount hole.

We’re still skeptical about the company’s claim that the skis melt and refreeze snow, but if the ski meets its goal of improved control, does it matter? Slydog skis provide a significant handling upgrade over Precision skis and other boards that compromise handling to reduce darting and steering effort.

One thought on “Slydog Snowmobile Skis Review

  • I had a pair of Slydog trail skis on my 07′ Phazer GT for 13 years. I ran 6″ shaper bars on them with 96 studs up the middle of the sleds meager Hacksaw track (120). Not only did they look fabulous when I sold the sled in 2020 they had very little wear and tear on them underneath. Granted I could have used less carbide on my sled in general I did find that the Slydog skis were a millions miles ahead of all Yamaha oem skis at the time. They almost provided too much steering bite requiring me to take some weight off the skis but I would buy them again in a heartbeat. Plus I really like that they are saddleless, the mount kit is essentially a cross bolt with some spacers. My skis were a blended molding of black and red together with red handles. The melting and freezing part sounds a little far-fetched but the tapered pyramidal underside is the cat’s pajamas and works well.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *